Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What Uber’s Joe Sullivan Case Means For ‘Sacrificial CISOs’
Forbes ^ | Oct 6, 2022 | Andrew Hay

Posted on 10/11/2022 4:14:08 PM PDT by piytar

Uber's former head of security, Joe Sullivan, was found guilty of obstructing an investigation by the Federal Trade Commission into Uber's security practices on Wednesday. He was also charged with hiding a 2016 data breach from authorities. This serious offense could have far-reaching implications for other Chief Information Security Officers (CISOs)- especially on the outsourced fractional/virtual CISO business model.

(Excerpt) Read more at forbes.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy
KEYWORDS: cisos; datasecurity
Pifalls of outsourcing data security. Hackers abound.
1 posted on 10/11/2022 4:14:08 PM PDT by piytar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: piytar

PS I am somewhat involved in the data security world...


2 posted on 10/11/2022 4:14:41 PM PDT by piytar (Do NOT forget Ashli Babbit!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: piytar
Pifalls of outsourcing data security. Hackers abound.

Whether kept in-house or outsourced, there are functions in a corporation or agency that need to be duplicated with complete firewalls in between the two teams. Everyone on each team has to live in fear that anything they miss will likely get caught by members of an unknown parallel team.

...but no one wants to pay for it.

3 posted on 10/11/2022 4:21:30 PM PDT by T.B. Yoits
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: piytar

CISOs, CTOs and CIOs need to spend more time talking candidly with people who’re hands-on with incident response and “white hat” stuff.

They really need a breadth of experience - it’s not as if they can afford to be hit by every conceivable attack vector to figure out the best responses and preventative measures; they need to learn from the experiences of others.

A competent C-suite understands that cyber security isn’t one of those things you can just silo internally and hide bad news from your supply chain, customers and regulators.

A truly resilient business doesn’t hide - it participates in industry forums like ISACs to communicate risk vectors. It promotes a speak-up culture. It doesn’t just run performative “don’t fall for spam!” training for the purposes of ticking a compliance box.

Over here in the UK, one enterprise that fell foul of a massive cyber security breach that brought it to its knees for months gives talks to other organisations in the sector, explaining exactly what happened, how it happened, how much hard work it took them to minimize the damage, how much harder it was to restore operations fully, and what lessons they learned.

Whatever reputational and financial damage they may have suffered in the breach has been recovered by their taking such strong leadership. Their candor and mentoring of even small businesses to ensure they don’t make the same mistakes, has made them heroes in their sector.

Probably a boring angle but I see this as the conflict between outdated MBA management practices, and cyber resilience. In the past, it’d be quite fun for a large corporation to watch a competitor lose out badly to some cyber criminal act, and just bury bad news when it comes, but these days that mentality could put you out of business.

The supply chain might overlap between you and your competitor - if they get hit, you get hit. So it is vitally important for business resilience to have your business partners AND suppliers AND competitors all sharing their experiences (within reasonable circles of trust). Hiding things from the regulators and the industry has false economies.

Maybe not so much in the USA, but COVID remote working transformations followed the same pattern. The businesses that innovated successfully helped others (including competitors!) to adapt - and they all benefited massively from the reputational boost.

It’s the ones who made a big secret of them actually doing very little to adapt, and then made a complete hash of it while going it alone, who suffered the most.


4 posted on 10/11/2022 4:38:25 PM PDT by MalPearce ("You see, but you do not observe". https://www.thefabulous.co/s/2uHEJdj)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: piytar

Uber pulled all kinds of stunts in their formative years. Tracking drivers and users. Redlining pickups from users and geographic regions. And I can’t remember how much more.

Even the drivers play games. Try to get an uber at a major airport. Half the drivers turn off their apps so the other half can get “surge pricing” due to “lack of available drivers”.


5 posted on 10/11/2022 5:03:56 PM PDT by monkeyshine (live and let live is dead)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: piytar

CISOs are the fall guy for the Congressionally dictated CIO under the Clinger/Cohen act.


6 posted on 10/11/2022 5:10:06 PM PDT by joma89 (Buy weapons and ammo, folks, and have the will to use them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson