Major paper: Scientists doubt Pfizer's claims about vaccines Demanding independent review of underlying data

wnd.com ^ | 10/5/2022 1921 hrs edt | Art Moore

[rktman]

Prominent medical scientists and physicians have been warning for more than a year that the mRNA vaccines were ineffective and posed serious health risks. Now, a major German newspaper is reporting that doubts are increasing among virologists, epidemiologists and pharmacologists about whether the information provided by the manufacturers is correct.

Die Welt reports the scientists are demanding an independent review of the studies that led to the approval of the BioNtech/Pfizer and Moderna shots.

The primary data supporting the studies, they argue, have been kept under lock and key by the manufacturers.

Last week, a top London cardiologist who was one of the first to take the COVID-19 vaccine and promote it on British television called for a suspension of the shots, arguing in a scientific paper that there is evidence the risk of harm is greater than any benefit.

Dr. Aseem Malhotra, who presented his paper at a news conference in the British capital, said "there is a strong scientific, ethical, and moral case to be made that COVID-19 vaccines rollout must stop immediately until raw data has been released for fully independent scrutiny."

[rktman]

WTAH? I could have sworn that someone tried to keep pumping sunshine to a place it ususally not getting any sunshine. It's "safe" they said. It's "effective" they said. Get some "boosters" that are also "safe" and "effective" they said. Would have been nice if some of these folks had that little light bulb go on over their noggins before buhzillions of folks got contaminated. We remain "NON GMO". 🔬🦠😷🚫💉☠️

[logi_cal869]

Clearly extreme misinformation by extremists being extreme.

[lizma2]

They need to check out The Daily Clout.

[rx]

[rx]

...and why would Pfizer go to court to attempt to keep the clinical data hidden for 75 years? Was it just because the testing was done by the CCP?