Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Supreme Court won’t take up defamation case involving MyPillow’s Mike Lindell
Philadelphia Inquirer ^ | October 3, 2022

Posted on 10/03/2022 8:40:23 AM PDT by Coronal

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 next last
To: Coronal

Lindell needs better legal advice than he’s getting. Sidney Powell? Sheesh.


21 posted on 10/03/2022 9:25:50 AM PDT by Tallguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coronal

Not so fast. You do know who Chief Justice Roberts said “No Standing” to, don’t you?


22 posted on 10/03/2022 9:34:11 AM PDT by Howie66 (Let's Go Brandon!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Leaning Right
Oh, and do I think the 2020 election had widespread “irregularities”? See my tagline.

I've had the same tagline since the 2000 elections. Never saw a reason to change it. It was true then, it's equally true if not moreso, now.

23 posted on 10/03/2022 9:37:53 AM PDT by usconservative (When The Ballot Box No Longer Counts, The Ammunition Box Does. (What's In Your Ammo Box?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ridesthemiles

Without discovery, Mike will become victim of a kangaroo trial.


24 posted on 10/03/2022 9:49:05 AM PDT by alstewartfan ("She looks like she's 19 years old, sitting there like a lady with her legs crossed." Creepy Joe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Leaning Right

These two web sites are a good start to a response to anyone who asserts otherwise.

https://hereistheevidence.com/

https://2000mules.com/


25 posted on 10/03/2022 9:51:51 AM PDT by FreedomPoster (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Leaning Right

Lindell will have a chance to present his “ irregularities”, including his double top
Secret “Data Packets” in a lower court.


26 posted on 10/03/2022 9:52:18 AM PDT by tennmountainman ( Less Lindell CONS, More AZ Style Audits)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Coronal

The SC said they will NOT take the case AGAINST Mike.

How is that screwing Mike?


27 posted on 10/03/2022 10:07:13 AM PDT by Maris Crane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maris Crane

This is how that reads to me as well.

They’re stating that they will not hear the case AGAINST Lindell. Dominion has no case.


28 posted on 10/03/2022 10:30:04 AM PDT by Billie Bud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Coronal

One thing I do know is that they claimed over and over that these were standalone machines, not connected to the internet. Then - it came out, they were all connected to the internet.

Did the company lie? Why?

We should be using open source code for voting. No more black boxes in our elections.

If France can verify an election in one night, then America can do so as well.


29 posted on 10/03/2022 10:45:01 AM PDT by Titus-Maximus (The trouble with socialism is that you soon run out of other people's zoo animals to eat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maris Crane

Read the article. Lindell had petitioned for the case against him to be dismissed. A lower court denied his petition, he appealed that ruling, the next court said that his petition was premature, and SCOTUS decided to not take up the appeal. So the case will go forward. Whether or not that constitutes “screwing” him, people can decide for themselves.


30 posted on 10/03/2022 10:46:09 AM PDT by Coronal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Billie Bud

No, that’s not what they said. Lindell had petitioned for the case against him to be dismissed. A lower court denied his petition, he appealed that ruling, the next court said that his petition was premature, and SCOTUS decided to not take up the appeal. So the case will go forward.


31 posted on 10/03/2022 10:47:03 AM PDT by Coronal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Coronal

32 posted on 10/03/2022 10:48:00 AM PDT by Titus-Maximus (The trouble with socialism is that you soon run out of other people's zoo animals to eat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coronal

Thus saith the voice of Kinshasha on the Delaware


33 posted on 10/03/2022 10:48:55 AM PDT by bert ( (KWE. NP. N.C. +12) Juneteenth is inequality day)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coronal

34 posted on 10/03/2022 10:51:23 AM PDT by Titus-Maximus (The trouble with socialism is that you soon run out of other people's zoo animals to eat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

“There was no widespread fraud in the election...”
“falsely accused”
“no fraud”

Add “Safe and Effective” to that list. :)


35 posted on 10/03/2022 10:54:11 AM PDT by T. P. Pole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Coronal

Sounds procedural. In federal court, most orders cannot be appealed until the case is finished. If the district court did not dismiss it, the appeals court won’t have jurisdiction.


36 posted on 10/03/2022 10:57:13 AM PDT by CraigEsq
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coronal

“There was no widespread fraud in the election, which a range of election officials across the country, including Trump’s attorney general, William Barr, have confirmed.”

Barr never investigated bupkis. He has admitted this.


37 posted on 10/03/2022 10:59:01 AM PDT by ConjunctionJunction (Vim vi repellere licet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coronal

But this isn’t about Lindell’s petition. This is Dominion suing Lindell for defamation. The Supreme Court rejected the case.


38 posted on 10/03/2022 11:20:14 AM PDT by Billie Bud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Billie Bud

No, they didn’t. READ it.

“The Supreme Court says it won’t intervene in a lawsuit in which Dominion Voting Systems accused MyPillow chief executive Mike Lindell of defamation”

They rejected his appeal of the lower court’s denial of that petition. They didn’t address Dominion’s case at all.


39 posted on 10/03/2022 11:26:10 AM PDT by Coronal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Coronal

I did READ the article which is SOLELY about Dominion’s accusation against Lindell and the Supreme Court not hearing. The Supreme Court did NOT reference the petition Lindell has had rejected at a lower court because that is irrelevant to them denying hearing g of Dominion case against Lindell.


40 posted on 10/03/2022 11:35:28 AM PDT by Billie Bud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson