The guy said that he doesn’t know about climate change because he’s not a scientist.
For that he is being pilloried.
A Supreme Court Justice can say she doesn’t know what a woman is because she’s not a biologist and that’s okay.
Why is it that in one case you’re allowed to profess that you just don’t have enough scientific knowledge to make a judgment about something, but in another case to use the same reasoning you are condemned?
Well, of course, we know, don’t we?/sarc
The guy said that he doesn’t know about climate change because he’s not a scientist.
For that he is being pilloried. Because he is not a leftist.
A Supreme Court Justice can say she doesn’t know what a woman is because she’s not a biologist and that’s okay. Because she is a leftist.
There are no other reasons.