Judge upholds Georgia election laws on all counts in voting rights case

The Atlantic Journal-Constitution ^ | Sept 30, 2022 | Mark Niesse

[fwdude]

A federal judge delivered a decisive ruling Friday against allies of Democrat Stacey Abrams in their 4-year-old voting rights lawsuit, upholding Georgia election laws on all counts in the case filed by Fair Fight Action days after the 2018 election.

[fwdude]

Paywall, but I thought this news was just too good to let get by.

[Governor Dinwiddie]

To God be the Glory!

[Tell It Right]

To get yer hopes up. This verdict about the 2018 Georgia election will be lifted up by the Dims as an example to say 2020 was also a fair election.

[Revel]

I read everything, and I seem to be at a loss as to exactly what happened and what it means.

[Bullish]

Stupid fat pancake broad can’t win an election on her own merit so she tried to sue her way in?

[Fresh Wind]

Amen!

[outofsalt]

Friday night news dump by the Urinal and Constipation.

[Chewbarkah]

Will Raffenberger appeal so he can turn victory into failure with a consent decree?

[Sgt_Schultze]

Here is the unlocked link

[Rennes Templar]

They just have no shame.

[FreedomPoster]

I see you are familiar with Ratenberger.

[higgmeister]

Why does this not mention the previously signed consent decree that allowed and even forced by judicial fiat all the fraudulent tactics that were used against President Trump and the Republican Party?

It also does not mention the recently passed voting law that reined in some of the fraudulent tactics used in the 2020 election.

Does this ruling overturn all the horrible machinations done after the lawsuit was filed?

[Roadrunner383]

“It also does not mention the recently passed voting law that reined in some of the fraudulent tactics used in the 2020 election. Does this ruling overturn all the horrible machinations done after the lawsuit was filed?”

Well, it might help if you understood that the judge ruled on the specific lawsuit that was before the court.

[higgmeister]

Well, it might help if you understood that the judge ruled on the specific lawsuit that was before the court.

No, it might help if the journalist explained how the specific lawsuit that was before the court related to the other already settled by consent decree between the same identical litigants two years ago and the legislation months ago that was intended to remedy the problems with that previous consent decree.

[Lazamataz]

Stupid fat pancake broad can’t win an election on her own merit so she tried to sue her way in?

Buck toothed Ghettopotamus will fraud her way in anyways.