Serious question and save the snark.
WHY?
This seems like no-brainer legislation to me that should have bipartisan support.
I read the article.
What am I missing here? Yeah, I know... Pelosi this or someone else that, but this does not make sense - even for them.
MAYBE when a couple of their kids or grandkids die from Fentanyl, they will wake up.
no snark. understand the history and basis of communism. at the bottom they (from marx) set up a theoretical duality of good vs evil or not good (as they define good). the way they define it is designed to change as history approaches an ‘ideal.’
their answer to their concept of not good or evil is to kill it for it’s own good.
hopefully that explains it and their actions. the ‘democrats’ are nothing more than radical communists. they are good slaves of their system—just executing their view of destroying evil (i.e., us and anything that we have that gets in their way) of what i call their ‘continuing solution.’
anytime, anywhere communism has been instituted, to varying degree, this duality is formed and destruction commences.
I agree. Why? I think this is a no brainer. It’s obviously in the public interest. To vote against it sends some troubling messages about them. Who’s side are they on? Not ours.
Its just the Democrat's plan to eliminate the homeless. Years ago the dems used them to raze funding and taxed but never intended to salve the problem.
Now they have become a big problem for all the big dem city's and their politicians. Its impacting the party up and down the ticket and could effect the number of congressional seats.
So what to do? Eliminate them. Its the same reason they keep letting all the criminals out of jail. They mostly kill other criminals.
Sure a few regular civilians will die but that's a price the dems are willing to pay. Its a necessary sacrifice for the party and equity.