“Even if we didn’t anyone who might have motive could bet on America being accused because Biden said we would”.
True. But Biden didn’t get something like that that out of thin air. He was told or heard that could be a possibility.
And Biden has a proven history of bragging on camera about stuff he shouldn’t brag about before a camera: like using the office of Vice President to bully another country (Ukraine) to cease investigating Hunter and fire the AG or bragging about the then pending campaign fraud.
Domestically the progressives do not give a flying flip about it, or they really support it, and like Hillary’s “vast right wing conspiracy” quip they have no issue being managed through talking points and outright denials of truth provided the wrongdoing is in their favor or by their fellow travelers.
Simply there are the “not-we” that any charge by them, against the “not-we” is considered serious, even if the accusation is ludicrous, and then there is a “we” that they will circle the wagons around to defend, almost without question.
When someone like Biden gets used to this state of affairs domestically, they can forget that internationally people may still not trust bastards or they may be willing to manipulate events in light of someone like him spouting off.
Ukraine, for example, contains an alternate route by which product may be shipped to the West and so a Ukrainian may have a motive to destroy NS2 but they would likely be considered a natural suspect by any and all ... if Biden hadn’t shot off his mouth.
I’m not saying they did this, or even that, having a prior relationship with the Big Guy when it comes to corruption they got Biden to do it for them, but they are an example of the sort that now had the opportunity to act because their motives have this potential cover.