I haven’t called you any names. I’ve labeled your position as neocon. And the label is accurate.
Just as I mentioned earlier, you’re using the neocon tactic of labeling someone as “pro-Putin”, “pro-Assad”, “pro-jihad” because we want to stay out of a manufactured conflict. It is dishonest but not unexpected.
You brush aside the deficit while at the same time being fine with giving that scammer Zelensky tens of billions. The deficit is itself an attack on America, which you support.
He is not even a neocon.
He is a supporter of tyranny.
Anyone who dispels the opinions of the founding fathers outright has no place in this country.
“I haven’t called you any names.”
Yeah, you called me a neocon. You can try to spin it otherwise, but you will fail.
“Just as I mentioned earlier, you’re using the neocon tactic of labeling someone as ‘pro-Putin’, ‘pro-Assad, ‘pro-jihad’...”
Come on, show us all where I have used the label “pro-Assad” or “pro-jihad.” You can’t, because I never did.
“It is dishonest but not unexpected.”
See above sentence.
“You brush aside the deficit while at the same time being fine with giving that scammer Zelensky tens of billions. The deficit is itself an attack on America, which you support.”
Nice try.
You sound young, as is evidenced by some of your earlier comments; so, I will refrain from taking you to the proverbial woodshed. But my tolerance is limited.