Well, since you are going to post this collage on every thread, I feel obligated to respond here, as I did elsewhere:
Taken as isolated soundbites, those statements raise eyebrows, no question.
But they are circumstantial. What is the totality of the interview? What was the context?
And, as for Sikorski, there is this response: “Poland’s Secretary of State, Stanisław Żaryn, denounced Sikorki’s claim on Twitter as ‘Russian #propaganda,’ calling it ‘a smear campaign against Poland, the US and Ukraine, accusing the West of aggression against #NS1 and #NS2. Authenticating the Russian lies at this particular moment jeopardizes the security of Poland. What an act of gross irresponsibility!’”
If this was your case in chief — and it would be your burden as the accusing party to present it — your case would be thrown out without further ado.
You are rushing to judgment.
You can quibble about circumstantial evidence vs ironclad proof [or an admission of responsibility] until the cows come home.
But this is not a court of law, but the World Court of Public Opinion.
And in that court, Biden’s America is obviously, blatantly, in-your-facedly guilty.
Please see 36 and 38.
Also, please read these: