Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: familyop

“There is a sense they’re avoiding being shot at by staying in their friendly territory and using their weapons capabilities” at longer range.

That’s the whole point of over-the-horizon weapons. Why would you get closer than you need?


10 posted on 09/27/2022 4:42:06 PM PDT by Flick Lives (FJB and the corrupt FBI)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Flick Lives

There are a lot of problems working as the Russians do.

One is that they are mainly limited to static or relatively static targets (on the ground). They cant use short reaction time or short travel time weapons, they cant use on-aircraft targeting like FLIR pods, they cant use laser-guided weapons systems for interdiction, and rarely for tactical use, etc. US aircraft can be on call to immediately attack transient targets like a ferry, a truck column, a train.

Another is inability to drop massive quantities of munitions. Under the conditions the US strives to create one US aircraft can drop many times as much explosive on a target (or a lot of targets) using JDAMs from above 15,000 feet over a target than a Russian can from 150 km away. And a 2000lb JDAM is much cheaper than any missile.

Etc etc. It is a very big deal.


15 posted on 09/27/2022 5:01:51 PM PDT by buwaya (Strategic imperatives )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson