Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: T.B. Yoits

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/2/1966

… the United States Capitol Police is authorized to protect, in any area of the United States, the person of any Member of Congress, officer of the Congress, as defined in section 4101(b) of this title, and any member of the immediate family of any such Member or officer, if the Capitol Police Board determines such protection to be necessary...

… As used in this section, the term “United States” means each of the several States of the United States, the District of Columbia, and territories and possessions of the United States...


13 posted on 09/26/2022 10:04:48 PM PDT by jjotto ( Blessed are You LORD, who crushes enemies and subdues the wicked.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: jjotto

Yeah, but the person has to be there.


22 posted on 09/26/2022 10:46:27 PM PDT by T.B. Yoits
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: jjotto

535 members of Congress——

Will ALL of them get ‘protection’???


50 posted on 09/27/2022 7:29:40 AM PDT by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: jjotto

Protection is one thing. Investigation is quite another.


52 posted on 09/27/2022 7:50:56 AM PDT by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: jjotto

Too much government is enabled this same way.


54 posted on 09/27/2022 4:49:54 PM PDT by HDML
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson