Didn't that happen pretty much from day one?
Suppose instead they very angrily denounced the election and demanded an investigation into the fraud? Supposed every one of them used every media opportunity to demand the crimes which occurred in Georgia's election be examined?
Didn't that happen with all the claims of packed ballots and the multiple audits and the lack of solid evidence to the contrary?
Suppose an army of lawyers and investigators traveled to Georgia and demanded that all the records be turned over precinct by precinct to be examined for fraudulent voting?
Trump's lawyers did precisely that with multiple challenges and multiple court cases, none of which came to anything.
When the actual evidence came out that especially Fulton county was rife with fraud, and the election could not be certified, then the State of Georgia would have had to hold a new election.
Still waiting for that evidence to come out apparently.
Name a single prominent Republican (other than Trump) that came out claiming election fraud. I'll wait.
Didn't that happen with all the claims of packed ballots and the multiple audits and the lack of solid evidence to the contrary?
What audits? This alone tells me you didn't pay any attention to what was going on. Yes, Lying backstabber Raffensperger said he did an audit, but he did not actually do any audits. He asked the same corrupt Fulton county election officials if everything was correct, and they said "Yes", everything we did was fine."
Arizona did some actual audits, but apparently the Republican leadership in that state's legislature decided not to do anything about the massive fraud they discovered. (75,000 fake votes in Maricopa alone.) It's my understanding that one prominent legislature lost his job because of his refusal to do anything about the vote fraud in Arizona.
Arizona is the only place that did a real audit. (Of Maricopa county only) Everyone else is lying.
Trump's lawyers did precisely that with multiple challenges and multiple court cases, none of which came to anything.
More proof that you didn't bother to keep up. All his cases were rejected based on "standing". The catch 22 argument made by the courts is that "Until you've been "injured" you have no standing to sue." By "injured", they meant until you have actually been removed from office.
Their argument after he was removed from office is "It's too late to do anything about it now."
Just more proof our court system is garbage.
No courts heard any of the cases that Trump's lawyers brought forth. They refused to hear them based on the "standing" dodge.
Still waiting for that evidence to come out apparently.
It's out, and once again you demonstrate you don't keep up with this issue. Why are you opining on something in which you haven't even bothered to make yourself aware of the basic facts?
Did you not see the videos of them pulling those boxes out from under tables (after the election counting was supposedly stopped) and then running the exact same stacks of ballots through the counting machines over and over again?
You didn't see those videos? You didn't see the videos of people wearing gloves dropping off all those ballots at the drop boxes?
Massive evidence. So much that no reasonable person could deny it.