No...spot on. Those of us who are paying attention see that! They just captured a house seat that hadn’t gone D in 40 years against a former VP candidate!
Tell the whole story. Rank choice voting caused that.
No...spot on. Those of us who are paying attention see that! They just captured a house seat that hadn’t gone D in 40 years against a former VP candidate!**************************** Actually the Republicans got 60% of the first vote while the Democrats got 40% and won.
60% of the first place votes went to one of the two Republicans, and 40% went to the one Democrat in that election. Republicans are too stupid to have only one candidate like the Dems do.
They captured that seat with a TOTALLY SCREWED UP way of voting IF the voting method had been NORMAL voting Sarah would have won handily!!!
If only the rats could win every seat after the repub won more than 60 pct of the vote cmon man
No...spot on. Those of us who are paying attention see that! They just captured a house seat that hadn’t gone D in 40 years against a former VP candidate!
That was due to the new ranked voting system and open primaries. Palin had 60% approval rating and would have won without the last minute election law changes by the Dims and assistant Dims. The Dim MSM then crows about how they are winning after a loosing streak to demoralize Pubbies.