Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Bullish
"The DOJ has a case against Trump? I had no idea."

As somebody on another site pointed out: "If the affidavit was bad news for President Trump, none of it would have been redacted."

7 posted on 08/27/2022 9:50:51 PM PDT by mass55th ("Courage is being scared to death, but saddling up anyway." ~~ John Wayne )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: mass55th

If ANYTHING would have incriminated Trump in any way then it would have been leaked already to their favorite yellow newspapers. That they haven’t speaks volumes. as usual, they’re the one’s that are dirty, not Trump.

Now, what do they do next?


25 posted on 08/27/2022 11:49:42 PM PDT by Bullish (Rot'sa Ruck America. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: mass55th

“If the affidavit was bad news for President Trump, none of it would have been redacted.”

Absolutely! Simple logic. So simple even a Democrat can understand it.

Trump is demanding that EVERYTHING be shown but they won’t do it. They’re covering their asses.

I think it was Posobiec who said they can’t legitimately use the excuse of hiding names of informants, because names of informants, even their undercover names, aren’t ever in these types of docs. Referred to as #1, #2, etc.


60 posted on 08/28/2022 6:22:43 AM PDT by MayflowerMadam (Sometimes when you get to where you're supposed to be, it's too soon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson