[Rockingham]

Artillery fire is problematic. Traditionally, even under the best of circumstances, about ten percent of shells hit unintended targets, including friendly troops. As it is, due to propaganda and misinformation, we have little basis on which to credit Russian claims that the Ukrainians are shelling their own nuke plant./p>

[UMCRevMom@aol.com]

“little basis on which to credit Russian claims that the Ukrainians are shelling their own nuke plant

Artillery fire is problematic.”

You are absolutely correct.

The drunk Russian soldiers with in add an increased level of concern. As this article is a report from within the Zaporozhye nuclear power plant, it is obvious these drunken Russian soldiers care less about the danger they cause by their actions.

The past videos have shown the storage of Russian military equipment within the facility. Russia military mined the ‘coastline’ of the hydraulic shop with Russian “guards” invaders walking drunk with their weapons.

The enemy conducts create targeted “attacks on ZAES objects, knowing exactly where to hit them.” The report states that the invaders definitely know where to shoot:
“They don’t shoot, for example, at the reactor compartment, where the power unit is located. But they shoot at an open distributor to damage the station’s communication lines with the Ukrainian network.

What these drunks can’t comprehend is the loss Zaporozhye nuclear power plant communication lines, results in the station non-production of electricity resulting in the losss of ability to cool the station when necessary.

Maybe Ukrainians can set-up a trojan horse filled with vodka for the Orcs to “capture.” Then, take the guards captive???

[PIF]

Artillery fire is problematic.
—

CEP of modern GPS guided shell at extreme range (over 40 miles) is 10 meters - the closer the artillery piece is to the target, the more the CEP decreases. Most guided shells are exact hits with zero CEP.