[MNDude]

I’m curious if this had any impact on the effectiveness of the vaccine or not.

From what I’ve read about it, the MRNA vaccine is a horrible design and destined to fail and kill from the start. I just wonder what difference it would have made if any if the standards hadn’t changed.

[higgmeister]

Good Grief.   I suspected that sort of thing way back when I saw the vaccine shots offered in drive through tent stations in parking lots at Churches and other gathering places.   There is no way the impromptu medics in places such as that kept the proper temperatures.   I made that comment on several threads here when the vaccines first came out.

I got my first two shots along with my wife at the Wellstar Clinic where our Doctor practices.   Our Doctor agreed those drive locations were a greater risk of not being effective, but I suspect it may have been, as you suggest, intentionally harmful under questionable situations.

When they began talking about the boosters we had had enough of the shenanigans and now I'm doubly glad we didn't get boosted.

The one guy asked the other guy "did you jump when you were boosted?"   Yes, a little at first.

[mewzilla]

There is also the subcutaneous instead of intermuscular issue, needles used that were too short for obese recipients.

So much for the mandated federally registered, pre-approved vaccinators.

[silverleaf]

That, and…the CDC directing that needles did not have to be aspirated
Curious
Increased the risk the jab would go directly into the bloodstream instead of the muscle
Which could have killed or damaged people