The problem is thugs putting their fat thumbs on the scale of justice by favoring one party over the other... the issue isn’t did the person ‘tell the truth’. The issue is “why does it only matter when ‘the truth’ is against a Republican”.
Of course that's the issue. My remark is that the story of the archivist being the whistleblower was entirely believable, that the writer, Susan Ferrichio didn't just make his identity up. The follow-up raid by the Feds wasn't the topic; that is the real debate, of course. Jeez. The archivist's identity is just an interesting tidbit as there was plenty of wild speculation about the "mole" identity.
OK - makes sense...