Really? That’s your question.
If they’re going to someone’s house and they’re fired upon. Or the person attacks them with a weapon.
Because doing what CornPop did, the money allocated, the intent to field this many folks, someone who feels like they have nothing to lose will act irrational.
And that is PRECISELY what the LEFT wants. Someone to harm or kill a federal agent. All bets are off at that point.
the intent to field this many folks, someone who feels like they have nothing to lose will act irrational.
And that is PRECISELY what the LEFT wants. Someone to harm or kill a federal agent. All bets are off at that point.
/\
That’s also my take.
They haven’t been able to get anyone to take the bait yet cuz the provocateurs are too few,,,
87000 at it everyday would find a trigger pretty fast I think.
Especially billions to foreign aid and invaders
and green new Marxist inflation bill
and armed irs showing up at someone’s door over a $ 32.69 tax dispute.
I know you don’t mean to insult me and I know we are both on the same side but I am not being disingenuous.
If the IRS today has the power of putting a person in prison for deliberately or accidentally falsifying a tax return or questionnaire statement, or being unable to come up with thousands of dollar after their ruling, and the right to withhold salary and bonuses and to take bank account and other wealth assets.....then what NEW factor makes them believe they would have to shoot their weapons?
As the early books and speeches of Robert J. Ringer (libertarian——I am not one) pointed out, the government has violence and guns behind its every move. He knew that sounded incendiary and exaggerated so he went into a few details and end the scenarios with “so deputies would then point their rifles and sidearms at you and handcuff you.” Can’t be denied. He said most transactions in a day include our total compliance with the government’s power and we all get used to it-——but there are loaded weapons they will use against any of us.
So why does the IRS think they will be using MORE weapons, this time their agents’ hands, to go along with the existing law enforcement and the military they can command?
My loaded and leading questions was perhaps disingenuous after all.
Your FRiend,
Frank B
I forgot one of my main points due to my upset over this armed IRS business.
If the IRS has to answer in what situation they believe they would fire weapons and thus need to arm themselves, would the “independents”, “moderate Democrats” and GOP voters recoil at the idea of picturing themselves confronted with newly armed IRS agents who might start shooting them at any given moment?
Some things upset people such as carjackings with their child still strapped in the child seat, a woman jogger being suddenly grabbed and pushed into a van to be beaten, raped and killed, and anyone in a city public place being mugged or pushed in front of a moving subway train. Even when the captive Dem media try to spin it nicely.
So, maybe in the twilight of America a few people might say:
I pay my taxes. And if you think you can shoot me or my family by arming your predatory IRS agents then F—— Off.
Maybe.