[daniel1212]

" I find debating the regular Free Republic hateful, ignorant anticatholic Free Republic commenters to be impossibly closed minded and illogical as to defy debate." Meaning that you parrot RC propaganda, and faced with posters as me who state what Scripture teaches - which is what the Lord and apostles referred to in reproving the valid historical magisterium of their day which rejected these reprovers as itinerant preachers - you attempt marginalize posters of such proofs as lacking theological credentials.

And thus you deny there is any real way cite the Bible in stating that the recipient of baptism must be repentant, when faced with the clearly stated conditions for baptism being that of whole-hearted repentant faith in the risen Lord Jesus, (Acts 2:38; 8:36,37) then shown that it is you who defy debate, with "get over it."

These are provided as examples contrary to "anticatholic Free Republic commenters to be impossibly closed minded and illogical as to defy debate," though many are, yet more so with Catholics. Your support of homosexual rights in the Masterpiece Cakeshop case seems to be about your most extended debates.

[stanne]

I read the catechism.

[stanne]

“… hit-piece on Catholicism and the rosary has actually increased rosary sales.”

This might tell you something