Posted on 08/17/2022 3:34:17 AM PDT by devane617
Bird murderers. It’s really a great dichotomy, these huge monstrosities vs nature, all for the sake of satisfying the psyche of the Eco-Nazis.
I couldn't believe my eyes when I first saw it.
But it was just passing through, and moved on.
I guess it didn't like the neighborhood.
But then - I didn't like paying the property tax rates there -
and moved on myself. The neighborhood was okay, though.
“Rising temperatures are projected to reduce golden eagle breeding ranges by more than 40% later this century...”
Obviously, it’s the Golden Eagles fault, being in the wrong place. We’re doing all we can to save the planet.
Is this like the piece yesterday that claimed since it’s so stinking hot in the summer, the fat kids don’t want to play outside anymore. Play in front of a windmill and give ‘em a frosty. Problem solved.
Destabilize the grid with wind turbines in hopes of placating the phony Climate Gods.
I put low speed elec fans next to the bird feeders, saves money on cat food./sarc
First, this is a stupid article, in that it promotes climate change as a real thing. Second, it tauts windmills over eagles. Windmills are a scourge on America. They would not proliferate were they not all massively subsidized with our tax dollars. In one hundred years every windmill built in the past 30 years will be in some landfill. They are inefficient, produce unreliable electricity, kill thousands of birds, and blight the landscape. They are the product of liberalism. And liberalism is a mental disease.
A blight on the landscape indeed. Flying over miles upon miles of these things, there’s nothing uglier scarring up our beautiful country where there used to be fields of grain and rolling hills.
Here in WV they’ve destroyed the view of ridgelines. Aside from removing the natural silhouette of trees so as to build the access road, we now have these ghastly monstrosities killing bats.
1) Climate change may alter where eagles roam 60 or 80 years in the future.
(probably not, and --if so-- with little or no consequence)
2) Giant eco windmills are killing eagles now.
These people have lost their f**king minds.
What rising temperatures? The degree of increase (or decrease) of average temperatures year round and for the same day year over year sinks to a very small change, and virtually NONE of it may be attributed to anthropogenic sources.
It is possible, in something like an urban setting, that the activities would have an effect on the microclimate that surround that locality, as cities are notorious sources of heat energy release. But the effect is confined to the area most concentrated with development, and ten miles away, the effects disappear entirely.
The rationale for “going green” and using solar power collection panels or windmill towers to achieve that goal are a fool’s errand, as the solar panels and the windmill towers are MUCH more destructive of resources than the use of natural gas or even coal, and the use of nuclear power is even more effective, both on a cost basis and in the total volume of “waste” or “spent fuel rods”.
Carbon dioxide is NOT a pollutant, but a vital part of the sustainable renewal of ALL of earth’s many life processes. Ignorance of this very basic fact is not excusable.
Rather a moot point when Gaia's planet will reach daytime temperatures of 212° F in the next 7 years.. /s
When the green dream of windmills everywhere is finally achieved there will be no more birds and bats alive. Will be blamed on 1) Trump, 2 ) conservatives, 3) climate change. Even though the ground around these things is littered with bird & bat carcasses.
Some one explain to me why wind turbines don’t cause Global Warming?
The process by which wind turbines generate electricity is that the wind turbine uses the energy of wind to turn a generator.
Therefore the wind turbine is altering the local climate directly by slowing the wind in its area.
Less wind reduces evaporation of water, less spreading of pollen and spores, less removal of heat from the ground, and so on and so forth.
Put up enough wind turbines and you are in essence building a mountain where there was none before.
How could this altering of the landscape not change the environment?
My guess is a large part of their operation budget is used for bird clean up so few people as possible see that.
Wind turbines slow the wind which is causing extreme Climate Change.
Prove me wrong.
If EPA did its job and not ignored the devastating environmental impacst of wind turbines, we would not have so many.
We have aesthetic pollution, high maintenance and operating costs, few options to dispose of the giant blades in addition to killing birds, eagles, bats, noise pollution, etc.
Wind turbines failure causes include birds, lightning, rainfall, blade detachment, delamination, blade cracks, extreme cold and other extreme weather conditions, and humidity.
Humidity related electrical failures are common reason and very expensive to fix. These failures are mostly due to high humidity levels over 60% in the nacelle and tower where the electrical components are located. The moisture in the air will weaken metal components such as the gearbox, bearings, and yaw gear.
The wind turbines only work when there is wind.
Only high subsidies by the government, and the EPA ignoring environmental impacts keep those economically unviable monstrosities around.
Electricity generated by wind farms is no less destructive of the environment than traditional methods; the argument can be made that they are a lot worse.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.