Here is how I would interpret the law if I were the judge: 1) You shouldn’t be denied the right to possess or buy arms on the intoxication logic so long as you are not intoxicated when you possess or buy the gun. 2) You should not be denied the right to bear arms on the criminal logic unless you’ve actually been convicted of a crime.
You should not be denied the right to bear arms on the criminal logic unless you’ve actually been convicted of a crime.
`````````````````````````````````````````
Please see #27.