Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Trump20162020

tried to watch the ad as a neutral observer.

Except for the repetition of the word “serious”, there was NOTHING in that ad that told me why I should vote for Miss Cheney, and not for Hageman.

A number of candidates for statewide office, including here in Arizona, try to side step the 2020 fraud by saying that we have to spend time on the future, instead of the past.

Miss Cheney puts that mantra on its head, as her entire ad is about the past, she just takes the other side. This tells me NOTHING about what kind of representative she is or would be next year.

What happened to the old “I sponsored this ...” “I co-authored that ...” “I am endorsed by ...” stuff that usually works for competent incumbents?

When she loses, it will be largely because she isn’t running to represent the people of Wyoming, but to be lead House Republican Persecutor of President Trump. That’s not a winning issue in a California primary, much less a Wyoming one.


13 posted on 07/28/2022 2:21:23 AM PDT by Dr. Sivana (What was 35% of the Rep. Party is now 85%. And it’s too late to turn back—Mac Stipanovich )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Dr. Sivana

She obviously thinks she’s in Congress to represent Washington DC. In a few weeks she’s going to get an education on that courtesy of the voters of Wyoming.


16 posted on 07/28/2022 3:27:36 AM PDT by FLT-bird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson