Guess "they" have redefined "infringed" in your funk and wagnells eh?
1 posted on
07/23/2022 2:20:27 PM PDT by
rktman
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
To: rktman
Anticipated compliance rate?
Who will enforce?
2 posted on
07/23/2022 2:22:20 PM PDT by
G Larry
(Anybody notice that Satan is hard at work?)
To: rktman
Lets change the definition of Left/Liberals to Terrorists
To: rktman
My "Hello Kitty" AR will be just fine.
5 posted on
07/23/2022 2:24:38 PM PDT by
dynachrome
(“We cannot save Ukraine by dooming the US economy.” Rand Paul)
To: rktman
6 posted on
07/23/2022 2:27:17 PM PDT by
Travis McGee
(EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
To: rktman
All they want to ban are:
AR-15’s.
AK-47’s.
Semiautomatic assault rifles.
Semiautomatic assault pistols.
Semiautomatic assault shotguns.
Semiautomatic rifles.
Pistols.
Revolvers.
Shotguns.
Air guns.
Knives.
Lead.
Gunpowder.
Rocks.
Metal.
Calculus.
Mathmatics.
Physics.
People.
Matter.
Energy.
Time/Space continuum.
God.
The universe.
Any possible multiverses.
9 posted on
07/23/2022 2:28:49 PM PDT by
Lazamataz
(The firearms I own today, are the firearms I will die with. How I die will be up to them.)
To: rktman
Just picking up on the original NFA-34 intent.
Few now know or care that the original NFA-34 intended to ban civilian hand-guns.
Self interest of legislators not wanting to have to give up THEIR OWN pistols got it amended.
You can look up a LOT of the history surrounding the NFA-34 and BATFE’s criminal past here, http://www.nfaoa.org
No longer interactive but still a great reference library for research.
11 posted on
07/23/2022 2:35:22 PM PDT by
Ex gun maker.
(Free thinking is now a radical concept, I will not be assimilated by PC or EV groupthink!)
To: rktman
Banning liberals would solve all of America’s problems.
12 posted on
07/23/2022 2:42:49 PM PDT by
maddog55
(The only thing systemic in America is the left's hatred of it!)
To: rktman
Estimated compliance rate for any such illegal “laws” or “regulations”
“ maybe …5 percent ?
16 posted on
07/23/2022 2:51:23 PM PDT by
faithhopecharity
(“Politicians are not born. They're excreted.” Marcus Tillius Cicero (106 to 43 BCE))
To: rktman
Near as I can tell, revolvers should qualify as semiauto pistols, making the first semiauto pistol date from around 1840 or thereabouts....
18 posted on
07/23/2022 2:54:35 PM PDT by
ganeemead
(There is no definition of patriotism that includes stooging or siding with Nazis against Christians.)
To: rktman
They think they know better
19 posted on
07/23/2022 2:54:57 PM PDT by
Nifster
(I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
To: rktman
Democrats are trying to jin up the gun grabbers and abortionists in a desperate attempt to keep control of the house.
The problem is people who vote because of gun control issues most likely are voting against gun control.
People who vote for politicians who support gun control want goodies from the government, gun control just may or may not come along with said goodies.
To: rktman
Lots of the banned weapons are the types that you may need when the Feds come a’ knockin’...
23 posted on
07/23/2022 3:01:28 PM PDT by
JimRed
(TERM LIMITS, NOW! Militia to the border! TRUTH is the new HATE SPEECH.)
To: rktman
I think there are now 25 States with Constitutional Carry, what if some or all of them passed this Identical Law and included ALL Federal Employees as prohibited persons!!!
25 posted on
07/23/2022 3:05:18 PM PDT by
eyeamok
(founded in cynicism, wrapped in sarcasm)
To: rktman
31 posted on
07/23/2022 3:20:23 PM PDT by
joma89
(Buy weapons and ammo, folks, and have the will to use them.)
To: rktman
32 posted on
07/23/2022 3:20:26 PM PDT by
joma89
(Buy weapons and ammo, folks, and have the will to use them.)
To: rktman
33 posted on
07/23/2022 3:20:28 PM PDT by
joma89
(Buy weapons and ammo, folks, and have the will to use them.)
To: rktman
Imo, if at this point a ban or not a ban makes a difference to anyone they should turn in the firearms they already own.
34 posted on
07/23/2022 3:26:43 PM PDT by
Born in 1950
(Anti left, nothing else.)
To: rktman
19 April, 1775.
Remember the date.
37 posted on
07/23/2022 3:32:11 PM PDT by
Howie66
(Let's Go Brandon!!)
To: rktman
I'm surely no constitutional scholar but it seems to me that the SCOTUS decision of a few years ago in "Caetano v Massachusetts" (a 9-0 decision,BTW) pretty much makes this piece of cr@p unconstitutional from the very start.
But Rat Party Headquarters doesn't care about constitutionality. They just pass a law knowing that it will take years for it to be overturned...and then they pass another.
To: rktman
I would not want to be the poor bast*rd that has to go out and collect them!
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
