Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ProtectOurFreedom

Families of the three who were slain should sue the Mall Owners for negligent homicide. By declaring a “no gun” policy, it encouraged the shooter to bring his weapon to the Food Court and start shooting. Their negligence led to the death of 3, and the injuries of many. Let us start suing for negligence against the stupid signs. Obviously, the shooter failed to heed it, and thank God that the hero disregarded their stupid sign.


11 posted on 07/19/2022 9:05:45 AM PDT by silent majority rising ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: silent majority rising

I suppose “management” would have preferred the shooter to keep killing customers until the authorities arrived.


21 posted on 07/19/2022 9:20:32 AM PDT by tbpiper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: silent majority rising

This is an excellent strategy.


25 posted on 07/19/2022 9:23:26 AM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom (“...see whether we in our day and generation may not perform something worthy to be remembered.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: silent majority rising

Families of the three who were slain should sue the Mall Owners for negligent homicide. By declaring a “no gun” policy, it encouraged the shooter to bring his weapon to the Food Court and start shooting.

- - - - - - -

No, if you see that a store encourages mass shootings, you should simply go to a store with a good security policy.

If you enter a store knowing it has a no gun policy and suffer from it, it is your fault.


60 posted on 07/26/2022 12:24:04 PM PDT by TTFX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson