Atheists are lecturing us on Bible passages.
I read this story earlier today.
Still shaking my head.
If liberalism is a mental disease, then these people are really, really sick. I’m disgusted.
The same people celebrate abortion.
First Roe v. Wade is overturned now this.
Leftists are just livid that the slaughter of innocents is being thwarted.
A good insight into the actual detachment from reality these anti-gun nutballs are in....
Call him a Hero Citizen, then.
He was abbreviated as GS.
So that was NOT Good Shooter?
Actually, if the Good Samaritan had showed up a bit earlier, he might have accomplished the same good, and the victim uninjured.
Justin Kollar
Fox News 59 (Indianapolis, Indiana)
So, if the original Good Samaritan had seen the young lawyer getting robbed on the road, he should have let him get robbed?
Like draft dodgers calling soldiers “baby killers” when they came home from Vietnam. Unless you were there your opinions don’t count and are just plain stupid.
FTA: “”The Good Samaritan paid for an unknown immigrant’s health care out of pocket,”
So Jews are immigrants in Israel? 2000 years ago?
Somehow the opinion of a “traffic anchor” is supposed to carry some kind of weight.
Hey Skippy, why don’t you tell folks where the backups and accidents are and keep your mouth shut about situations you obviously aren’t smart enough to comprehend.
L
Correction: He selflessly placed himself in harms way to preserve the lives of people whom he did not know and had no professional or familial duty to help. That is the very definition of a Good Samaritan.
“Guardian angel” probably wouldn’t make them any happier.
What’s got the libs panties bunched up is the fact that this story is being reported at all. It’s supposed to be blacked out like every other truth that blemishes their narrative.
Yeah, so guess how they would react to the accurate description: heroic citizen stops mass murderer.
They would have choked, I think.
How about Saint or saving angel?
‘Critics are lashing out after a man carrying a pistol stopped a mass shooting at an Indiana shopping mall, arguing the man should not be called a “Good Samaritan.’
They said as they cowered in their bullet proof offices guarded by armed guards?
Leftist progressives are such more ons(more on this later) and they can’t seem to grasp the simplest fact that a “good samaritan” is someone who helps someone even though there is no requirement to. Unlike the blue that get paid to help...but don’t. This person didn’t have to even get involved and could have just walked away. Or hid in a hallway. Perhaps that is a better way to appease the more ons? Just my two cents.