The study adjusted for that. Needle kneelers just went right along after seeing so very many test positive and experience flu symptoms at the worst. They believed the lie that there were millions positive with no symptoms.
After decades in the lab every one will tell you, correlations with symptoms are evidence their test system is accurate. Pcr targets set by who?
And we were using single target positives, probably still are. That a not just no for pcr testing. Multiple targets are standard because pcr tests have a higher false positive rate.
Any solution the government, particularly global governments are pushing is suspect from the word go.
Kneel once and they will never allow you to rise again.
See #41. These graphs are meaningless. Manitoba has a small population. Only 2 or 3 deaths in each of the three groups. You simply cannot get any meaningful statistical analysis out of such tiny numbers.
If three obese unvaccinated people with diabetes died during a month, but only two fully vaccinated people with no risky underlying health conditions died, the graph would reverse. How would you like that? (BTW, there is no adjustment for those with/without comorbidities.) As those with such underlying health conditions are more likely to be vaccinated, such a scenario would be somewhat unlikely but entirely possible — we are talking very small numbers here where only one death death flips the chart.
As you can see, in previous months the charts showed the unvaccinated as having the highest risk for serious outcomes. The actual numbers involved are still very small, though, and I don’t think they can get anything statistically meaningful out them, either.