Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: laweeks

Have you heard from Josh Hawley’s question to the Berkeley women’s professor of lunacy-— she used the term “the capacity for pregnancy”..

Capacity for pregnancy includes trans “men” who can become pregnant (since they are genetic women, and have a uterus?) and she answered Hawley that way. Beyond non-sensical verbage.

Men who become trans=”women” are included in this crazy womans definition. They however have NO capacity to become pregnant in the normal sense— unless, and this is quite sketchy— they have a fertilized human egg EMPLANTED in “representative” tissue that would function as a womb? Frankenstein did better with his patch up cadaver.


27 posted on 07/14/2022 11:49:03 AM PDT by John S Mosby ( Sic Semper Tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: John S Mosby
Have you heard from Josh Hawley’s question to the Berkeley women’s professor of lunacy-— she used the term “the capacity for pregnancy”..

Yes, and after listening to her gobbledygook, I wondered how in the world she ever got a teaching/instructor position anywhere. And how the audience didn't break out into laughter is beyond me.

29 posted on 07/14/2022 12:50:33 PM PDT by laweeks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson