More than 260,000 Troops Not Fully Vaccinated, Many Face Discharge Under Biden Administration Mandate

Breitbart ^ | 13 Jul 2022 | KRISTINA WONG

[mac_truck]

Soldiers can go work for one of the growing number of private military contractors, and make much more money doing it.

[subterfuge]

Being jabbed in biden’s military is a litmus test. The unjabbed are to be purged for perceived disloyalty to the globalist plan to excert complete control.

[V_TWIN]

They know a certain number will bail...also that a certain number will pass on enlisting to begin with.

[robel]

The government would love to get rid of the noncompliant, if they could only get enough snowflakes to sign up.

[butlerweave]

Is it part of their plan for the Draft and only for Non-Democrats this time

[mewzilla]

But Deep State is allowing the partially vaxxed to stay...?

Continuing proof, as if it were needed, that CoupFlu policy has NEVER been about public health.

[duckman]

Vax= Death Jab= Clot Shot.

[TruthWillWin]

Explaines why we are sending all that money to Ukraine.

[Harpotoo]

Ya ssee, nobody want to DIE for Fauxci & the resident so discharge them and set them FREE!

[jimjohn]

Agreed. the TX and AZ DMV should give them all driver’s licenses, along with every Peace Officer let go for the same reason, and head down to the valle del río grande for some live-fire exercises. After all, they wanted to serve their country, right?

I would actually contribute financially for that.

P.S. You would think even some dems in congress would think to intervene in this suicide policy. But alas... see tagline.

[jimjohn]

Fewer tweets have never been more accurate.

[Alberta's Child]

Losing nearly 270,000 troops would devastate our military. That’s more than twice as many U.S. troops than died during World War I from all causes, and almost as many as died in combat during World War II. Our adversaries are probably delighted to see the Pentagon eliminate more troops than they ever could.

When was the last time the U.S. needed 270,000 soldiers for ANY military campaign?

As another Freeper astutely noted recently … every military campaign the U.S. has waged since the Korean War has been fought against an enemy wearing sandals on the battlefield.

[cranked]

Institution of the draft no doubt coming given the recruitment levels across all service branches have fallen like whale sh*t heading for the bottom of the ocean floor? =.=

[riri]

He's not wrong.

Kinda hard to collect military benefits when ya dead.

[Roklok]

If they had any honor, every member of the Joint Chiefs should resign.

[antidemoncrat]

Must get rid of conservatives in the military so when Milley orders the “woke” soldiers to open fire on peacefully protesters they will say “With pleasure sir”.

[Toespi]

Sadly, “honor” is NOT a valuable trait in this country anymore.

[piytar]

Devastating our military is not a bug for Biden. Sure he considers it a feature.

[T.B. Yoits]

When was the last time the U.S. needed 270,000 soldiers for ANY military campaign?

The 270,000 are not needed on the front line. The Tooth-To-Tail Ratio (T3R), depending on the engagement, might mean that of the 270,000 only 35,000 are "on the ground".

[bitt]

OMG!