Replies

“And I’m sure “she” won’t be paying that.”

I found the rule and it’s punish listed guidelines. It is currently up to the someone to determine the amount. Not sure who it is going to be. The doc’s in Ohio, the performing doc is in Indiana, and it could possibly be determined to be covered within interstate commerce and opens up a whole can of worms.

Ohio AG is Dave Yost, a strong republican

Indiana AG is Todd Rokita, another strong republican

Lord knows who they will ask to fall on their sword to determine the punishment for this obvious hippa violation going through the commerce department. The people there may look like the road runner when he opens it up and leaves a trail of flame behind him.

At this point there is no doubt there needs to be some painful punishment applied. Especially since the child could have asked and been treated with the abortion in Ohio. This one may make the courts not for the procedure but for the illegal action of the Ohio doctor by denying the child the abortion besides lying to the patient and who has jurisdiction.

Additional, the entire effort of erasing Roe was to get it out of the federal courts and back into a medical determination so the feds can’t touch states’ rights. Hope this doesn’t reopen even the smallest piece of that.

wy69