Posted on 07/06/2022 7:37:30 AM PDT by rktman
Unlike the Watergate hearings, the Benghazi hearings, all past impeachment hearings, or the House Un-American Activities Committee, this committee does not have a single person who might present a challenging set of questions for any of the witnesses brought before the American people.
From Supreme Court confirmation hearings to the aforementioned congressional proceedings to the OJ Simpson murder trial to the Johnny Depp/Amber Heard defamation trial to any episode of Judge Judy, the American people have come to expect that we would hear "the other side" to every issue put before us. No matter how paltry the defense of any given charge might be, we take for granted that we will hear that defense, and we, the people, will be allowed the respect to reach our own conclusions.
Perhaps if Rep. Jim Jordan had been on this committee as the GOP leadership had hoped, one or two challenges to Cassidy Hutchinson's hearsay testimony might have been presented. Perhaps some exploration into her desire to continue to work with President Trump in Mar-a-Lago in his post-presidency would have emerged. Or her damning comments about the "BS" committee (she's right about that) would have come out.
(Excerpt) Read more at townhall.com ...
There will come a day for payback.
In the Soviet Union they were called kulaks. Here they’re called conservatives, but ‘progressives’ want to do the same thing with them if they can.
Good one... that day has come and gone for decades, yet the vile, evil, liberal scum continue unabatted.
Like the overly possessive mind set of “If I can’t have it, NOBODY can have it and I’ll make sure nobody wants it when I’m done!”. For sure psychos. 😵💫🤬
Ping
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.