To: BeauBo
It surprises me that Japan doesn’t have a more robust nuclear program than it does.
18 posted on
07/05/2022 9:26:15 AM PDT by
Opinionated Blowhard
(When the people find that they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic.)
To: Opinionated Blowhard
It surprises me that Japan doesn’t have a more robust nuclear program than it does.
We STILL haven't gotten seriously on board with nukes since the Three Mile Island hiccough.
The Fukishima disaster was considerably worse. The reaction to nukes is emotional to too many people. Serious NIMBY problems, too.
(For the record, I lived under two miles away from the Byron, IL nuke plant. It was a good neighbor.)
31 posted on
07/05/2022 9:44:21 AM PDT by
Dr. Sivana
(What was 35% of the Rep. Party is now 85%. And it’s too late to turn back—Mac Stipanovich )
To: Opinionated Blowhard
It surprises me that Japan doesn’t have a more robust nuclear program than it does.Virtually the entire country is either earthquake-prone or susceptible to tsunamis. They have a few nuclear reactors located as safely as possible, but are understandable reluctant to build more.
34 posted on
07/05/2022 9:53:28 AM PDT by
BfloGuy
( Even the opponents of Socialism are dominated by socialist ideas)
To: Opinionated Blowhard
Fukishima put that on hold.
40 posted on
07/05/2022 9:58:51 AM PDT by
laplata
(They want each crisis to take the greatest toll possible.)
To: Opinionated Blowhard
Well they had this thing happen to them in 1945 two times, that really left a bad taste in their mouth about anything nuclear. I’m not sure, I think it was on a couple of southern cities. I think involving B-29s.
57 posted on
07/05/2022 12:02:09 PM PDT by
DesertRhino
(Dogs are called man's best friend. Moslems hate dogs. Add it up..)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson