So an assessment of the invasion's status that differs from your own qualifies as "pathological"
How utterly deranged.
(Out of curiosity, if the article had opened up with "Ukraine is winning and will win its war with Russia", would those two claims also count as unsupported?)
Silly Rabbit! That would obviously depend upon whether the article then went on to actually furnish such supporting information!
The article, as it stands, does not analyze the current military situation on the ground, but instead indulges in wanton speculation about possible future developments (or simply takes certain developments for granted, to then pile further unsupported claims on top of them).
The article does not attempt to compare the relative military and economic strengths of the various different parties involved - directly or indirectly - in this conflict.
The article does not attempt to quantify casualties and losses of materiel or analyze the tactical incompetence exhibited by any of the parties.
The article does not attempt to assess the impact of economic sanctions or the relative abilities of the opposing sides to withstand them.
The article is pretty much worthless in almost every regard. Its goal is obviously only to spread worry and propagate defeatism.
Regards,