Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DoodleDawg
By calling them an 'inconvenience' for something literally every country in the world offers?

This is a stupid trap and you shouldn't get caught in it. The woman is not the inconvenience, the pregnancy is not the inconvenience, it's the fact of having to account for staffing and scheduling that is the inconvenience. It's no less an inconvenience if the government requires parental leave to be offered, it's still an employee being out of the workplace for an extended period of time, shifting of job duties, maybe hiring or training a temp, and all on a schedule out of control of the employer.

There are plenty of things to point to where employers don't value their employees and don't deserve loyalty from their employees. Acknowledging reality isn't one of them.

34 posted on 06/29/2022 8:36:57 AM PDT by jz638
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: jz638
The woman is not the inconvenience, the pregnancy is not the inconvenience, it's the fact of having to account for staffing and scheduling that is the inconvenience.

Without the woman or the pregnancy the there would be no staffing or scheduling problem. or no 'inconvenience'.

36 posted on 06/29/2022 8:46:09 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson