* Not in connection with his duties as a coach
* No captive audience
* Religiously-oriented speech prohibited, but not secular.
Now let’s see the “coercive” standard applied to the blue-haired, pierced-nosed manatees spewing their sexuality to the captive audience of students as part of class time.
We’ve been given the ammo to fight classroom perversion & grooming with this case.
Yes, frame it as a violation of religious rights for a captive audience (I’m not a legal so probably not the correct language).
It certainly appears the gender perversion indoctrination is a definite violation of religious freedom for conservative parents ( and that could apply to Christian, Jew, Muslim or even non religious parents who just feel that that stuff is morally wrong for children).