They can kiss my viewpoints.
Well, that didn’t take long.
Because today, “good moral character” doesn’t mean what you think it means...because the word “good” is subjective.
A “good” Muslim: don’t drink alcohol, women should be submissive, gays thrown off buildings, death for insulting Mo
A “good” Christian: do unto others..., love they enemy, ...
A “good” lefty: LGBTQIA+ ideas should be indoctrinated into young kids, drag queen story hour, etc.
This isn’t going to end well.
The AG apparently thinks that if a citizen wants to exercise his 2nd amendment rights, he must forfeit all other Constitutional rights.
wow i did nazi that coming
What do I need to identify as to get a “permit?”
this is a good idea. All leftists, progressives, democrats, and generally useless, ok-with-breaking-the-law, defund-the-police types should NEVER be allowed licenses, much less guns.
Another great reason why may issue has been struck down.
Allowing government officials discretion over a citizen’s ability to exercise their constitutional right will inevitably lead to abuses. Some of those will be pecuniary “your chances of getting the concealed carry permit you want would go up considerably if I had a Rolex watch on my arm” and some will be ideological “I will prevent people I deem to be political enemies from exercising their rights”.
I can see the CA AG spending lots of time in federal court generating billable hours for the ALCJ that will be paid by California taxpayers.
Why would I let an asshat impact my security?
If THAT becomes law, no leftist should EVER be permitted a firearm....or ANY OTHER type weapon.
Mental health not an issue though
Public-carry license applicant provide proof of ‘good moral character’ remains constitutional
1.It’s California what would they know about good moral
character’.
2.Remains constitutional
Didn’t find that in it.
So Corruptofornia wants to use the First Amendment rights of a citizen to stop the Second Amendment rights of a citizen base on if they believe democrats are the scum of the earth?
Sounds like the scum of the earth part is proven by the first part.
What is needed is national reciprocity. A permit in Texas is good in every other state and visa versa. The 2A is in the Bill of Rights and clearly states “shall not be infringed” so the feds do have the right to make reciprocity national.
And when these rules are struck down, they have 100 more in the drawer. Applications accepted only the third Tuesday of a leap year.
I disagree, vehemently.
If you have to "provide proof" to exercise a right then you no longer have that right - it has been completely infringed upon.
Just who's morals will be used to judge "good" moral character?
What is the objective measure of "good" or good enough moral character?
Apply these same standards to the First Amendment and see how (equally) ridiculous they sound: I'm sorry, you can talk all you want at home, but you're not allowed to speak in public or on the internet unless and until what you are going to say has been pre-approved by the government.
Section 9. U.S. Constitution
No Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed.
The National Socialist German Workers Party approves.
Perhaps the California AG’s office can contact the Communist Chinese government for tips on instituting a social credit system.