Skip to comments.
Now the Left turns on RBG: Radicals point blame at late Supreme Court judge for DYING in 2020 as they say it paved way for Amy Coney Barrett
dailymail ^
| 6/24/2022
| james gordon
Posted on 06/24/2022 5:05:31 PM PDT by RummyChick
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-75 next last
ROFL
Not even RBG is safe from getting canceled.
To: RummyChick
To: RummyChick
Dig her up and slap her around - you’ll feel better 🤪
3
posted on
06/24/2022 5:06:48 PM PDT
by
NWFree
(Somebody has to say it)
To: RummyChick
4
posted on
06/24/2022 5:07:17 PM PDT
by
EEGator
To: RummyChick
To: EEGator
people are getting this wrong
6-3 was dobbs
To: RummyChick
To: RummyChick
THis is so insane I thought the thread had to be a BAbylon Bee entry!
8
posted on
06/24/2022 5:09:50 PM PDT
by
MHGinTN
(A dispensation perspective is a powerful tool for discernment)
To: RummyChick
No, But they can “blame” Ginsberg if they want for her admission that Roe was not founded in the written Constitution.
9
posted on
06/24/2022 5:10:14 PM PDT
by
Wuli
To: RummyChick
10
posted on
06/24/2022 5:10:29 PM PDT
by
EEGator
To: RummyChick
To: RummyChick
They wanted “democracy” and that’s what they got. Vote on it, in your state legislatures.
Why allow a group of 9 justices to decide your freedoms?
12
posted on
06/24/2022 5:11:57 PM PDT
by
Hypo2
To: RummyChick
13
posted on
06/24/2022 5:12:25 PM PDT
by
Drew68
(Ron DeSantis for President 2024)
To: RummyChick
She didn’t trust 0bama to name her replacement. Classic.
14
posted on
06/24/2022 5:13:07 PM PDT
by
ConservaTexan
(February 6, 1911/June 14, 1944)
To: RummyChick
15
posted on
06/24/2022 5:14:25 PM PDT
by
GraceG
("If I post an AWESOME MEME, STEAL IT! JUST RE-POST IT IN TWO PLACES PLEASE")
To: RummyChick
I honestly think RBG had no respect for Zero. She wanted Bill’s wife to name her replacement..
To: EEGator
5 voted for
3 voted against
and traitor Roberts nearly got his way
To: RummyChick
18
posted on
06/24/2022 5:16:10 PM PDT
by
EEGator
To: RummyChick
They have a point.
She hung on long enough to allow Trump to win so he could appoint a conervative judge, all because she wanted to make hisotry of having the first woman President (Hillary) appointing a female judge to replace the first female judge.
I’m just glad she did that.
19
posted on
06/24/2022 5:17:01 PM PDT
by
Jonty30
(I would sell my family for a billion dollars and then buy them back when go on clearance.)
To: Hypo2
Why allow a group of 9 justices to decide your freedoms?Should have never happened in the first place 50 years ago. It should had been a constitutional amendment if people really thought it was that important to have it on federal level.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-75 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson