It it just me or, when you read the courts opinions\findings on cases they are ruling on, the liberal justices are always worried about the ramifications of the rulings instead of just looking to see plainly, whether the law in question is constitutional or unconstitutional? That is all their job is. Its is not to feel bad for people because of X. Its not to prognosticate what is going to happen next. Is the law we are reviewing constitutional or unconstitutional and why? And its always the liberal justices who do this. I have not seen a conservative justice ever do this once.
Guess the libgressive wait for polling data.
If you decide cases based upon feelings then there is no consistency. Since the law needs to be predictable in order for society to function, you simply CANNOT have cases decided based upon feelings. Also, doing that tends to embolden mobs to try to influence decisions that should ONLY be influenced by the text of the Constitution, law and relevant facts.