Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: boxlunch
Are you dense? They ruled that the initial ruling 50 years ago was in error, was not constitutional so they rescinded that ruling which was wrong in the first place. They didn’t make anything legal or illegal today,they just removed a bad ruling from 50 years ago.

Maybe I'm just not understanding you. If the court lacked jurisdiction, as you seemed to state in your reply 348, then how could they overturn Roe?

Your posts certainly seem to be, you are arguing every which way against this ruling as if you hope there is some way around it.

Stating fact is not taking a position on that particular fact one way or the other. Sorry if reality is too much for you to take.

404 posted on 06/24/2022 11:56:56 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 401 | View Replies ]


To: DoodleDawg

I didn’t say they lacked jurisdiction. They overturned a previous wrong decision.

Well, I’m happy, thankful and celebrating today and sorry if I misunderstood you. I’ll leave it there.


405 posted on 06/24/2022 11:59:06 AM PDT by boxlunch (10th Amendmt: nullification or Texit? PS We're in a hot war: globalists, CCP, media, Dems, RINOs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 404 | View Replies ]

To: DoodleDawg

Can you say, thank you President Trump?

Go ahead, give it a try.


454 posted on 06/24/2022 5:02:04 PM PDT by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 404 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson