135 page opinion, sounds comprehensive.
Thomas logic appears to be similar to Scalai’s “long standing” defensse of unconstitutional laws, in Heller.
In this case, “consistent with this Nation’s historical tradition of firearm regulation” are acceptable. I don;t know wh the NY law isn;t considered long standing. It’s older than the laws Scalia upheld.
The main pdf if not nearly that long. Give it a read.
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/20-843_7j80.pdf