Those aren't issues in this case.
"I really don’t see the need to dump “strict scrutiny”. It has protected the First Amendment pretty well despite dramatic advances in technology. We need that for the Second Amendment."
No scrutiny is better than strict scrutiny.
I don’t agree. Twenty five or so states no longer require carry permits. That constitutes proof that California is not compelled to demand such permits since there is no blood running in the streets.
This decision allows California to inconvenience people with hardly any limits as long as their laws do not allow subjective discrimination. Strict scrutiny was not a bad way to go as far as I can tell.