Ok. “ruling” is ambiguous but your posts suggest that there is no way to indict Byrd. What is the evidence that Byrd did not commit a crime? Compare that to the political Jan 6 punishment for those who did not kill anybody.
Right now there isn't. The matter has been investigated and the finding was no crime was committed by Byrd.
What is the evidence that Byrd did not commit a crime? Compare that to the political Jan 6 punishment for those who did not kill anybody.
No, compare that past findings in police shootings all over the country. There are dozens, hundreds of cases where police shot and killed unarmed suspects and the shooting was ruled justified. Why should this be any different?