I see no dishonesty. I don’t think that’s because I’m blind, I think that’s because your case is weak, because although the source may not meet your standards for rigir, no true dishonesty is present.
Sorry SM. Not willing to go round the maypole with you this time.
The article, citing the Daily Mail, says there’s been a surge. That’s the entire premise of the article and if there hasn’t been an increase there’s no reason for the article nor any ability to attract clicks from the credulous.
Yet the Daily Mail article they cite doesn’t support that claim.
It’s a lie, and a lie you haven’t even attempted to refute.
You are indeed blind to this indisputable fact because it doesn’t fit your narrative.
Prove me wrong. Show me any evidence there’s been a surge in SADS.