Posted on 06/07/2022 7:03:25 AM PDT by Callahan
Congress will simply carve out a clause from their “common senes gun law” making it legal to shoot “white supremacists”.
This is Louisiana, so I am curious as to party affiliation—it doesn’t seem an idle question given the state. One might still ask the question in WV as well I imagine.
Are there Dems who run openly pro-gun elsewhere?
He is for background checks, storage laws and raising the age of gun ownership.
Plus, shooting white supremists - which means “Trump supporters”.
What party do you think he is?
"Gary would support bans of the sale of military-grade weapons.“
"The only purpose of a military-grade assault weapon is to harm other humans. You cannot use an assault weapon for hunting. According to Everytown research: “In the 12 years from 2009 to 2020, there were at least 30 mass shootings (16 percent of those with known weapon data) that involved the use of an assault weapon, resulting in 347 deaths and 719 injuries. In other words, mass shootings that involved an assault weapon accounted for 25 percent of all mass shootings deaths and 76 percent of injuries.” We need to get these weapons out of the hands of those who would perpetrate these crimes. Both the shooter in Buffalo and the shooter in Uvalde used assault weapons."
Who mposes more of a threat to blacks, a guy in a KKK hood, or a gang-banger?
So why didn’t he use gang-bangers as targets?
Just curious where white supremacy is being taught in our schools? Is it an elective because i just dont see it.
Oh man...I am so keeping that photo.
Thanks!
I’ve known people who worked in ERs, and they make lists of things they find “up there.”
The most amazing one they recounted was a softball. I think you have to work up to that.
Of course. Why would there be any other purpose?
In our world as conservatives, those "other humans" would be people who might invade our homes at night while we sleep, or a tyrannical government that wishes to illegally imprison us, rob our liberty, or unconstitutionally persecute us.
Therefore, that statement is 100% correct.
Those of us who believe this might ask: is Gary Chambers the kind who wants to invade our house or tyrannize us, or is he...something else. He doesn't have the gumption to come into a darkened house at night to openly rob the way an "honest" criminal might (he plans his larceny legally via his elected office) so it is my guess that he is the kind who wishes to tyrannize us and rob us of our liberty.
Snopes is a hunk liberal site, incapable of objectively debunking hardly anything
Uh...the guy is black. End of story.
Or “Who poses more of a risk to black people? The KKK? Or other black people?
How many minorities have the KKK killed in the last 10 years? Comlare that numnber to How many black people were shot by black people yesterday. I thi k you will find that thr number of black,people,shot by other black people was far higher in one day than thr KKK shot in 10 years
Dang, I meant snopes is a BUNK liberal site- geez, autocorrect strikes again
Guns are safe. It’s the guy breaking the law using a gun that is not.
What people in the comments here seem to be missing is that this advertisement is exhorting racial violence against whites. The hooded Klansman targets are simply avatars used to dehumanize an entire race of people. That such an add would be created, presented and promoted tells you all you need to know about the state of this nation.
We’ve seen this over and over in history.
It never ends well.
Semper vigilans, vigilo.
Uh...the guy is black. End of story.
So is the only high federal office holder that I would be tempted to clone.
A lot of gravy comes to them in the Senate. I’m guessing that, like most that go into politics, he’ll say whatever it takes to get that gravy.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.