[Gay State Conservative]

If Glock can be sued for this then Ford/Toyota/Honda/VW can be sued for drunk driving deaths.

[stevio]

Or high-speed crashes. Who needs a vehicle that can go over 70mph?

[newzjunkey]

It’s a little different. They are trying a camel’s nose strategy probably inspired by tobacco lawsuits. If they can’t make firearms illegal they want to make them unprofitable so they kill the market. I don’t see why Glock would have a fiduciary responsibility for some of these claims or care about putting constraints on the secondary market. They’re in the business of making money and it’s against their reason to exist to try to stop people from lawfully buying their product.

That said… Southern District of New York. It’s like tech patent trolls flocking to Southern District of Texas. Or trying to prosecute Sussman in DC metro. The outcome is preordained.