Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MarvinStinson

Durham threw this case intentionally.

L


29 posted on 06/01/2022 6:18:01 AM PDT by Lurker (Peaceful coexistence with the Left is not possible. Stop pretending that it islam )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Lurker
Durham threw this case intentionally.

I agree, sort of. I think Durham punted when he brought the case in the first place.

Here we have a case of huge potential felonies being committed and he picks a relatively minor decision maker and charges him with what looks and sounds like a misdemeanor. Yes, the lie had a big impact on a cooperative, even anxious FBI, but it would not have worked without the willingness of the agency to believe what they were hearing.

I don’t think Durham is going to go after any of the biggies let alone her majesty.

62 posted on 06/01/2022 8:01:19 AM PDT by InterceptPoint (Ted, you finally endorsed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

To: Lurker

The evidence of guilt was overwhelming. Durham did not throw the case. The judge handcuffed the prosecutors by denying them the ability to present relevant evidence. Even if the prose utor was allowed to prese t that evidence, there was never going to be a conviction from a D.C. jury.


74 posted on 06/01/2022 11:17:13 AM PDT by WASCWatch ( WASC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson