Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: gas_dr

Yes. And we propose to create laws against requiring or forcing vaccination as a condition of anything. Those laws are supported by conservatives and vehemently opposed by Democrats. The same conservatives also support laws allow employees to keep a firearm in their locked car at the place of employment.

It was you who argued that we were trying to limit the “freedoms” of employers. You have now confirmed...it is a matter of law and not freedom. Thank you for making my point. Now you can go back to your job of neglecting patients and denying their freedom to try.


92 posted on 06/08/2022 9:22:41 AM PDT by SecAmndmt (Cv19 vaccines are Phase 2 of the CCP bioweapon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies ]


To: SecAmndmt

It is a matter of law, you are correct, and your dishonesty is quite humorous. I believe I said you want to engage in law fare and have a judge enforce your will. I also stated that if this is your position, your remedy is to run for office, and then pass a law. Your so called proposal to create laws are set that, proposals. Not law. I think you pain with a broad brush. I can name several prominent conservative who disagree with your position.

And you are trying to limit the freedoms of an employer. just not through legislative action. The laws as it stands in various states that are at will states (which if you had any historic understanding were the original positions supported by conservatives) you would understand that the conservative position is that of private contracts and remedies of torts. You are a neocon by definition espousing this particular line of thought.

Perhaps you should in no particular order:
1. Actually make an argument that is supported by law
2. Actually understand the context of your argument
3. Not falsely claim agreement and you have some how proven a point when you demonstrate only a superficial understanding of the issues
4. Stop employing obviously Alinsky techniques when you are getting your ass kicked in an argument
5. Lay off the insults — the neglecting patient crack is seriously close to libel.

In conclusion, perhaps it would be reasonable to actually make an adult argument instead of implying 6 year old debate strategies.

Have a pleasant evening


93 posted on 06/08/2022 3:50:05 PM PDT by gas_dr (Conditions of Socratic debate: Intelligence, Candor, and Good Will. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson