I’ve noticed a number of comments on this site, among presumably strong conservatives, as this is a conservative site, saying they can’t support certain GOP nominees for various offices, because they are too liberal for them.
And some go on to say they will vote for the Democrat instead.
Some of these people don’t think through the consequences of their votes. For example, electing the Democrat in PA could well enable the Democrats to keep control of the Senate.
Do these conservatives who bitch about the GOP nominee being too liberal, really prefer Chuck Schumer to be in charge of the Senate? Their vote could help enable that.
“For example, electing the Democrat in PA could well enable the Democrats to keep control of the Senate.”
Paging Captain Obvious.
But nominating “Dr. Oz” has already guaranteed loss of this seat and probable ongoing Democratic control of the Senate. That’s not the fault of any conservatives, that’s the fault of the morons who voted for him in the first place.
Who said that? I've never seen that.