“So you just agree with Muslim terrorists that Bush was a war criminal that should be assassinated. Got it.”
"Nope,"
Well, you did call Bush a war criminal and wish that assassination went forward. Sounds like agreement even if not for the same reasons.
"“You’re either with them or you’re with us” rhetoric that gave our “leaders” the excuse to drop more than 350,000 bombs on 7 countries over 2 decades." Or at least 181,590 bombs at targets in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Syria from 2007 to 2021, counting i assume all sizes while Israel reportedly (if you believe the UN) dropped 350,000 cluster bombs on southern Lebanon in a much smaller time.
And yet no country has ever engaged in such successful precision targeting of military targets as the US. However, at issue is the liberal fantasy that the spread of US military bases is wholly unnecessary, and strikes on such countries as Afghanistan, Iraq, and Syria are unwarranted, and that if the US would simply engage in isolationism, and not counter Communist and Islamic expansionism then the world would be peaceful. Or that America would not be threatened by it. Or at least it must have pure motives before engaging in military action. I do not subscribe to all that, though I do not think Vietnam or the second gulf war was warranted, but that Communist and Islamic expansionism must be opposed with a better military, vs. the Wokism now infecting it. But that as America is increasingly at war with God, it is inviting defeat by the sword of its enemies.
“Well, you did call Bush a war criminal and wish that assassination went forward. Sounds like agreement even if not for the same reasons.”
LOL. Dude literally invaded 2 different countries that did nothing to us and it has resulted in millions of deaths. It has nothing to do with my agreement with Muslim terrorists. It has everything to do my understanding of what a war criminal is.