Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sauropod

As any cop will tell you, they do not shoot to kill. They shoot to stop the threat. That means putting bullets into the big center mass of the body, the chest. Putting bullets in chests is very likely to lead to death, but the goal is to stop what they are doing. Their death is merely a by product of that, not the “goal” per se. The proof of that is that when they are dumped, a professional department has it’s officers begin first air on the downed bandit.

To that end of stopping them, it’s chest and head.
There is no place in that business for leg shots and other lunacy. It isn’t even worth the risk. So essentially yes, it’s “shoot to kill”, even though technically that is not the goal.


15 posted on 05/25/2022 3:05:59 PM PDT by DesertRhino (Dogs are called man's best friend. Moslems hate dogs. Add it up..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: DesertRhino

I’ll take it.


24 posted on 05/25/2022 3:24:05 PM PDT by sauropod ("We put all our politicians in prison as soon as they are elected. Don’t you?" Why? "It saves time.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: DesertRhino

Yes. Putting criminals on the ground is primary…putting them in the morgue, while a nice byproduct, is secondary.


50 posted on 05/25/2022 4:00:37 PM PDT by rlmorel (Nolnah's Razor: Never attribute to incompetence that which is adequately explained by malice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson