And here it is, why none of this will be of consequence (last pragraph)
“Crucially, public release of the notes came after the five-year statute of limitations had lapsed in March of this year. The question is why the DOJ — and Durham in particular — gave the FBI a free pass. The uncomfortable answer may be that, as has been suspected for a while, Durham’s authority is effectively limited to private actors such as Sussmann and Danchenko and does not extend to public officials such as McCabe and Strzok.”
The writer calls the situation “perplexing.” What does it mean that authority is “effectively” limited? By what law or which people? Or is it an unspoken rule of honor among thieves?